German public radio and television (SWR) just published a whitepaper about the fediverse: "Chancen des Fediverse für Journalismus"
-
Central thesis: "In a world where established platforms are turning from the promised rescue of digital journalism to its danger, journalism should consider being active in the fediverse."
-
Central thesis: "In a world where established platforms are turning from the promised rescue of digital journalism to its danger, journalism should consider being active in the fediverse."
I can see all Nato countries jumping on the fedi right now.
-
Central thesis: "In a world where established platforms are turning from the promised rescue of digital journalism to its danger, journalism should consider being active in the fediverse."
I don't read German, but I was curious and wanted to let an LLM translate it at least a little. They published a PDF which has full-page images in it. Why? It's utterly perplexing to publish something to the internet that way. It's like having the ability to share a stone tablet, but instead you take a picture of it and put that behind glass with a filter so that it can only be viewed form certain angles.
Sometimes, I don't understand Germans.
-
That would be amazing.
-
Perhaps that was exactly the intent, to ensure that only actual humans read the content? Germans certainly are a breed of their own, but if they (generally speaking, of course) are not ones to do something odd like that without intent.
-
There have been Finnish politicians joining Mastodon in in the last few weeks.
-
Perhaps that was exactly the intent, to ensure that only actual humans read the content? Germans certainly are a breed of their own, but if they (generally speaking, of course) are not ones to do something odd like that without intent.
Perhaps that was exactly the intent, to ensure that only actual humans read the content?
If that's the case, it has the opposite effect. Humans generally benefit from being able to select text and not just read from an image. It's of course especially important for blind people.
Meanwhile computers can easily read images via OCR algorithms.
-
Perhaps that was exactly the intent, to ensure that only actual humans read the content?
If that's the case, it has the opposite effect. Humans generally benefit from being able to select text and not just read from an image. It's of course especially important for blind people.
Meanwhile computers can easily read images via OCR algorithms.
It wasn't intentional. One of the authors wrote on Mastodon that there's "something wrong with the text layers" and the Media Lab is working on it.
It seems like they outsourced the pdf creation to someone who doesn't know how to properly create pdf's or the wrong version got published, which I'm suspecting because the title of the pdf is "layout draft 2024-12-16".
-
It wasn't intentional. One of the authors wrote on Mastodon that there's "something wrong with the text layers" and the Media Lab is working on it.
It seems like they outsourced the pdf creation to someone who doesn't know how to properly create pdf's or the wrong version got published, which I'm suspecting because the title of the pdf is "layout draft 2024-12-16".
Good to know. Thanks. I'll wait on the next post when the fixed version has been uploaded.
-
Time to learn ,first start with dutch ,almost tesame as german
-
don't assume malice for what can be explained by incompetence
-
Central thesis: "In a world where established platforms are turning from the promised rescue of digital journalism to its danger, journalism should consider being active in the fediverse."
Most "journalists" are just stooges of the ruling class.
They won't switch until their overlords tell them to.
-
Central thesis: "In a world where established platforms are turning from the promised rescue of digital journalism to its danger, journalism should consider being active in the fediverse."
even virtual democracies have gotten this.
