Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Bluesky just verified ICE

Bluesky just verified ICE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
203 Posts 90 Posters 128 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    This post did not contain any content.
    JessicaS This user is from outside of this forum
    JessicaS This user is from outside of this forum
    Jessica
    wrote last edited by sayjess@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    #14

    How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

    B trickdacy@lemmy.worldT 2 Replies Last reply
    8
    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

      If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

      L This user is from outside of this forum
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      lordxdnl@literature.cafe
      wrote last edited by lordxdnl@literature.cafe
      #15

      I wonder if that is acutally better though, or just as problematic in the other direction

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      9
      • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

        but one implies that the other will not be done.

        This is false.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        balsoft@lemmy.ml
        wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
        #16

        Do you expect bsky to ban ICE? They already have a job posting to join the Gestapo in their profile, is that not enough?

        Someone at bsky verification team looked at this, and instead of flagging the account to be reviewed and removed, they pressed the "verify" button. If you give them the benefit of doubt, this was a mistake from someone on the verification team, but realistically speaking a corporate platform turning into a Nazi bar is quite natural nowadays.

        rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
        8
        • L lordxdnl@literature.cafe

          I wonder if that is acutally better though, or just as problematic in the other direction

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          balsoft@lemmy.ml
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          It is a lot better. If you let Nazis join your platform, your platform is now a Nazi bar. Ban them, don't let them spread their propaganda.

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          20
          • JessicaS Jessica

            How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            balsoft@lemmy.ml
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            Bsky is actually quite centralized. Bluesky the company owns the only full-network indexer (I think they call it a "relay" or something), which collects posts from all other servers and allows those posts to be rendered by various apps (e.g. bsky.app, but all other frontends use the same indexer). They could just ban them at indexer level.

            But even that is moot, because they are letting them host their account on a server Bluesky the company owns, bsky.social.

            irelephant [he/him]I 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

              It is a lot better. If you let Nazis join your platform, your platform is now a Nazi bar. Ban them, don't let them spread their propaganda.

              I This user is from outside of this forum
              I This user is from outside of this forum
              iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              They still can't post shit against the general instance rules. So they'd have to be very careful of get the nuisance of getting their posts constantly removed, and eventually banned. No need to make individual distinctions when the general rules already work.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

                Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

                hansolo@lemmy.todayH This user is from outside of this forum
                hansolo@lemmy.todayH This user is from outside of this forum
                hansolo@lemmy.today
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                I look forward to them being confronted with views they can't just ask Elon to delete.

                But, let's be real here, this is rage bait to track people using their first amendment rights in a way they don't love. BSKY doesn't need to give up anything on users. Users accessing BSKY ip addresses given up by their ISP will be more than enough for Palintir to find. A few links with trackers provide browser fingerprinting. Easy day for them.

                Be careful, y'all.

                1 Reply Last reply
                11
                • ShimitarS Shimitar

                  (Not American here)

                  While i agree fediverse is then solution and i don't use bluesky, i don't see the issue is recognizing ICE as verified.

                  After all ice is a government agency of the USA whether you like it or not, and should be verified if there is a procedure to do so.

                  No i don't like ice and i do not condone what they do, but that doesn't change the above statement.

                  LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                  LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                  Leon
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  You know that the problem isn’t that they’re verifying the gestapo, it’s that they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

                  W D ShimitarS 3 Replies Last reply
                  81
                  • S syndication@lemmy.today

                    Isn't the whole point of the verification checkmark is to make sure nobody impersonate well known people/organizations? I know Twitter eventually turned it into a whole cash grab subscription and ruined the concept, but on most other platforms it isn't treated like some premium subscription and is just a means of knowing who is who.

                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    H This user is from outside of this forum
                    hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    I don't think anyone impersonating gestapo would post anything worse than they already do, so there's no damage there

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • I iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world

                      They still can't post shit against the general instance rules. So they'd have to be very careful of get the nuisance of getting their posts constantly removed, and eventually banned. No need to make individual distinctions when the general rules already work.

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      balsoft@lemmy.ml
                      wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                      #23

                      Nazis are quite good at bending or evading rules to further their agenda. They will push the boundaries of what's acceptable by using creative allegories or dogwhistles. Moderators are supposed to moderate assuming goodwill from participants, this should not be the case here because ICE is not operating in good faith; a good mod will know to just ban self-identified nazis straight away. Even if the mods are hesitant to ban without any activity, me thinks a job ad to join the modern Gestapo (which is already in ICE's profile) should be grounds for a ban.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      17
                      • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

                        Do you expect bsky to ban ICE? They already have a job posting to join the Gestapo in their profile, is that not enough?

                        Someone at bsky verification team looked at this, and instead of flagging the account to be reviewed and removed, they pressed the "verify" button. If you give them the benefit of doubt, this was a mistake from someone on the verification team, but realistically speaking a corporate platform turning into a Nazi bar is quite natural nowadays.

                        rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                        rglullis@communick.news
                        wrote last edited by rglullis@communick.news
                        #24

                        I don't know how else to say it: you keep falling into the same non-sequitur.

                        No, I don't expect them to ban anyone from the government. And, no, I don't think it would be wise to do it: verifying the account does not mean they are supporting it, it just means they are making sure that whatever crap ICE is saying can not go around without accountability.

                        If you don't want to see their shitty posts, now you can simply filter it out. And thanks to verification, you can share your filters to others. That's how decentralized systems work. Bluesky does not control who I get to see. ICE or any other institution can not buy its way into manufacturing propaganda. It's not ideal, but it's better than any of the existing alternatives.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                        7
                        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

                          If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

                          photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                          photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          The nature of FOSS allows anyone to use free software like Lemmy and Mastodon. ICE could therefore join by making their own instance or joining a friendly one but it'd be defederated by most others.

                          The great thing about fediverse is that everyone gets a voice and we can choose who to listen to.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          54
                          • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                            It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

                            Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

                            flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)F This user is from outside of this forum
                            flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)F This user is from outside of this forum
                            flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            They completely deindexed Link (spacelawshitpost.me) for not showing appropriate reverence for Charlie Kirk after he died by pointing to their TOS policy on promoting violence, but an organisation that only exists to exert violence on non-white people gets a pass.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            11
                            • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                              I don't know how else to say it: you keep falling into the same non-sequitur.

                              No, I don't expect them to ban anyone from the government. And, no, I don't think it would be wise to do it: verifying the account does not mean they are supporting it, it just means they are making sure that whatever crap ICE is saying can not go around without accountability.

                              If you don't want to see their shitty posts, now you can simply filter it out. And thanks to verification, you can share your filters to others. That's how decentralized systems work. Bluesky does not control who I get to see. ICE or any other institution can not buy its way into manufacturing propaganda. It's not ideal, but it's better than any of the existing alternatives.

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              balsoft@lemmy.ml
                              wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                              #27

                              No, I don’t expect them to ban anyone from the government.

                              So, you would be OK with a newspaper accepting ads and publishing an opinion column from Gestapo or SS? They were official government organizations after all.

                              And, no, I don’t think it would be wise to do it: verifying the account does not mean they are supporting it, it just means they are making sure that whatever crap ICE is saying can not go around without accountability.

                              You are once again presenting a false dichotomy. The choice is not only between "verify" and "not verify", there is also the option to "ban". Banning ICE would not let them post Nazi propaganda on their platform at all.

                              That’s how decentralized systems work. Bluesky does not control who I get to see.

                              1. Bluesky is de-facto centralized, they operate the only full-network indexer, they get to control what accounts can post to all frontends
                              2. They are hosting the ICE account on their own server and domain (bsky.social), and make it available through their own frontend (bsky.app). They definitely can control that, even if there were other indexers available

                              There is no excuse for bluesky to be hosting nazis. They have the choice, they are making that choice, fuck em.

                              ICE or any other institution can not buy its way into manufacturing propaganda.

                              They literally can. Except in this case they didn't even have to pay, the corporate overlords of bluesky will let them post propaganda for free.

                              rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                                It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

                                Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

                                CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]C This user is from outside of this forum
                                CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]C This user is from outside of this forum
                                CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                take accountability

                                [Citation needed]

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comP photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                  The nature of FOSS allows anyone to use free software like Lemmy and Mastodon. ICE could therefore join by making their own instance or joining a friendly one but it'd be defederated by most others.

                                  The great thing about fediverse is that everyone gets a voice and we can choose who to listen to.

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                  wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                  #29

                                  Truth Social is running Mastodon under the hood. But nobody considers it a part of the fediverse, because even if it had federation turned on it would instantly be defederated by 99% of instances.

                                  I'm sure there are nazi lemmy instances out there, but they are all defederated from the lemmyverse.

                                  This is the correct approach, decentralized platforms are somehow doing a better job at this then the de-facto centralized bsky.

                                  HanrahanH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  23
                                  • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

                                    No, I don’t expect them to ban anyone from the government.

                                    So, you would be OK with a newspaper accepting ads and publishing an opinion column from Gestapo or SS? They were official government organizations after all.

                                    And, no, I don’t think it would be wise to do it: verifying the account does not mean they are supporting it, it just means they are making sure that whatever crap ICE is saying can not go around without accountability.

                                    You are once again presenting a false dichotomy. The choice is not only between "verify" and "not verify", there is also the option to "ban". Banning ICE would not let them post Nazi propaganda on their platform at all.

                                    That’s how decentralized systems work. Bluesky does not control who I get to see.

                                    1. Bluesky is de-facto centralized, they operate the only full-network indexer, they get to control what accounts can post to all frontends
                                    2. They are hosting the ICE account on their own server and domain (bsky.social), and make it available through their own frontend (bsky.app). They definitely can control that, even if there were other indexers available

                                    There is no excuse for bluesky to be hosting nazis. They have the choice, they are making that choice, fuck em.

                                    ICE or any other institution can not buy its way into manufacturing propaganda.

                                    They literally can. Except in this case they didn't even have to pay, the corporate overlords of bluesky will let them post propaganda for free.

                                    rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    rglullis@communick.news
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    So, you would be OK with a newspaper accepting ads

                                    What I am "OK with" has no impact whatsoever in "what actually gets to happen". I rather not waste my energy on the things that I can not control.

                                    Banning ICE would not let them post Nazi propaganda

                                    It would. They would just do it from unverified accounts. Worse still, they would be able to post it and completely deny it if confronted about it.

                                    the corporate overlords of bluesky will let them post propaganda for free.

                                    Spammers also get to send millions of messages every day for "free", but we mostly ignore it because we are able to filter them out. Sure, it would be great to completely get rid of spam and the phishing industry... but there is no way to completely get rid of them that does not involve increasing the surveillance aparattus and given more power to a centralized enforcer, so if I have to choose between spammers and corporate-controlled communicatioins, I will take the spammers any day.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      As they should. You only get a ban after you break their rules.

                                      tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                                        So, you would be OK with a newspaper accepting ads

                                        What I am "OK with" has no impact whatsoever in "what actually gets to happen". I rather not waste my energy on the things that I can not control.

                                        Banning ICE would not let them post Nazi propaganda

                                        It would. They would just do it from unverified accounts. Worse still, they would be able to post it and completely deny it if confronted about it.

                                        the corporate overlords of bluesky will let them post propaganda for free.

                                        Spammers also get to send millions of messages every day for "free", but we mostly ignore it because we are able to filter them out. Sure, it would be great to completely get rid of spam and the phishing industry... but there is no way to completely get rid of them that does not involve increasing the surveillance aparattus and given more power to a centralized enforcer, so if I have to choose between spammers and corporate-controlled communicatioins, I will take the spammers any day.

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                        wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                        #32

                                        What I am “OK with” has no impact whatsoever in “what actually gets to happen”. I rather not waste my energy on the things that I can not control.

                                        You are in control of which social media you use, and even more so in control about which companies you choose to support or defend. You are currently spending your energy defending a company that is hosting a de-facto nazi account on their servers.

                                        Let me rephrase the question. If a newspaper you enjoy reading started publishing a column from Gestapo, what would you do? Would you boycott and complain? Would you just complain and keep buying it? Or would you keep buying it and defend their actions by "well I can just skip that page with the nazi propaganda on it"?

                                        It would. They would just do it from unverified accounts.

                                        Well, yeah, but that would take effort in creating&advertising new accounts. Why make their nazi jobs easier?

                                        Worse still, they would be able to post it and completely deny it if confronted about it.

                                        There is literally nothing stopping them from doing it now. Having a verified account does not impede their ability to create fake unverified accounts in any way.

                                        Spammers also get to send millions of messages every day for “free”, but we mostly ignore it because we are able to filter them out. Sure, it would be great to completely get rid of spam and the phishing industry… but there is no way to completely get rid of them that does not involve increasing the surveillance aparattus and given more power to a centralized enforcer, so if I have to choose between spammers and corporate-controlled communicatioins, I will take the spammers any day.

                                        I would agree with this (except bluesky is also corporate-controlled). There is no way to completely cut out spam, including nazi spam.

                                        But in this case someone from Bluesky looked at this account which self-identifies as a nazi organization, verified that it belongs to a nazi organization, and hasn't banned it. It is clearly different.

                                        rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          skisnow@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          Literally every post they make is going to have a thousand people telling them to go fuck themselves

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          11
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World