Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Bluesky just verified ICE

Bluesky just verified ICE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
203 Posts 90 Posters 128 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LeonD Leon

    You know that the problem isn’t that they’re verifying the gestapo, it’s that they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    ObjectivityIncarnate
    wrote last edited by
    #47

    they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

    You could make that argument about them being allowed to have an account at all, but simply marking that account in such a way that informs the userbase that it's not a troll/parody account or something, but the actual organization?

    That doesn't "platform" them, they're already on the platform at the time this happened. And confirming that something asserted to be true, is in fact true, is a good thing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

      If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      CerebralHawks
      wrote last edited by
      #48

      Might depend what instance. They wouldn't try to verify on db0 because yes, they would be banned instantly with prejudice. They would probably just hop on Lemmy.world or something.

      Furthermore, it would be better if the US Government just put up their own instance. Let each instance decide whether or not to federate with them, and let users decide if they want to follow them or not.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • H hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        I don't think anyone impersonating gestapo would post anything worse than they already do, so there's no damage there

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        ObjectivityIncarnate
        wrote last edited by
        #49

        You haven't been on the Internet very long, huh?

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • R raman_klogius@ani.social

          The block log is public. It's basically giving uncle Sam a list of targets to hit next.

          Instead burn the bridge connecting to bsky, or ignore the account clientside which is not public.

          irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
          irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
          irelephant [he/him]
          wrote last edited by
          #50

          Lemmy blocks are really just mutes. On mastodon, admins can see if you blocked someone.

          The fediverse really isn't better in this regard.

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • LeonD Leon

            The new corporate platform is just as problematic as the old corporate platform made by the same person? Wow, what a revelation.

            irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
            irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
            irelephant [he/him]
            wrote last edited by
            #51

            Jack Dorsey has little involvement in bluesky.

            He rage quit the board of directors after they started moderating content.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

              Bsky is actually quite centralized. Bluesky the company owns the only full-network indexer (I think they call it a "relay" or something), which collects posts from all other servers and allows those posts to be rendered by various apps (e.g. bsky.app, but all other frontends use the same indexer). They could just ban them at indexer level.

              But even that is moot, because they are letting them host their account on a server Bluesky the company owns, bsky.social.

              irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
              irelephant [he/him]I This user is from outside of this forum
              irelephant [he/him]
              wrote last edited by
              #52

              There's another relay: https://atproto.africa/ .

              Relays don't index posts, they collect them from different servers, and provide a "firehouse" of events.

              You can crawl pdses directly, akin to the fediverse. AppViewLite does this (and is lightweight enough to run on a phone).

              You don't need a relay or appview with https://reddwarf.app/ .

              The fediverse also has relays.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

                If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

                ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
                ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
                Shimitar
                wrote last edited by
                #53

                I don't ban anyone or any instance in my own instance, so no they cannot be "parammanned" from Lemmy. That's not how it works and why i like Lemmy and its principles.

                geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  LorL This user is from outside of this forum
                  LorL This user is from outside of this forum
                  Lor
                  wrote last edited by lorski@sopuli.xyz
                  #54

                  Block them if you want. Block lists are public so... use caution.

                  There are MANY government accounts on Blusky. I think if they did not verify them, the government would find someone to buy them or shut them down. Use your heads here.

                  geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG 1 Reply Last reply
                  9
                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    lechekaflanL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lechekaflanL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lechekaflan
                    wrote last edited by lechekaflan@lemmy.world
                    #55

                    On paper it's a government agency which would normally be allowed to have verification.

                    However it is a government agency functioning more like a hate group, right now very inimical to the concept and idea of civil rights (already enshrined as law), and hostile to diversity and social justice; with absolutely no regulation of its activities, it is an agency mandated directly by the executive to remove anyone who is not white and Christian.

                    Unfortunately, Bluesky still has to verify them.

                    tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT 1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • 🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖M 🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

                      Why are people so max about this?

                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      krashmo@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #56

                      Because they want corporations to do their job for them of holding the government accountable.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • LeonD Leon

                        You know that the problem isn’t that they’re verifying the gestapo, it’s that they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

                        ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
                        ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
                        Shimitar
                        wrote last edited by
                        #57

                        Wake up. Ice, being government, it's already legitimized enough in real life.

                        What difference would it make in the social media. Better if they are out in the open in social media instead, at least they get responsible for what they post, officially.

                        trickdacy@lemmy.worldT 1 Reply Last reply
                        14
                        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                          Posting propaganda for a terrorist organization engaged in widespread public abuse is against their rules, do they allow official verified pages for groups like ISIS or Boko Harem?

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          wrote last edited by auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                          #58

                          They haven’t posted anything yet.

                          ‘Official verified’ isn’t a thing on bluesky. It’s self-verification, just means you own the domain.

                          Most western governments are terrorist. Can you name an administration that isn’t guilty of war crimes? Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

                          trickdacy@lemmy.worldT B JessicaS tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT 4 Replies Last reply
                          1
                          • LorL Lor

                            Block them if you want. Block lists are public so... use caution.

                            There are MANY government accounts on Blusky. I think if they did not verify them, the government would find someone to buy them or shut them down. Use your heads here.

                            geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                            geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                            wrote last edited by
                            #59

                            I prefer the instance blocking Nazis instead of users manually having to do so.

                            ripcord@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
                            12
                            • R raman_klogius@ani.social

                              The block log is public. It's basically giving uncle Sam a list of targets to hit next.

                              Instead burn the bridge connecting to bsky, or ignore the account clientside which is not public.

                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              K This user is from outside of this forum
                              krashmo@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #60

                              You don't have to be such a bitch about everything. If you guys can't even work up the courage to block a government account on an obscure social media site for fear of reprisal then you might as well enroll yourself for deportation right now because you clearly don't have what it takes to do anything actually useful to stop all this.

                              ripcord@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                BappityB This user is from outside of this forum
                                BappityB This user is from outside of this forum
                                Bappity
                                wrote last edited by
                                #61

                                why is this such an issue?? it just shows everyone who to clown on more?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                  Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

                                  The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

                                  trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trickdacy@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #62

                                  So?

                                  Any place Nazis are allowed is not a place I want to be. At least on any Lemmy server I'd not block, Nazis get banned

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  12
                                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    trickdacy@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by trickdacy@lemmy.world
                                    #63

                                    Everyone responding here and confused why this matters seem not get the point. This post is just a warning that the types of people most of us don't want to associate with are now on that platform. The problem is not that they are verified, it's that they exist there at all.

                                    Edit: some reasonable arguments have been made here for allowing these Nazis on Blue sky, which I originally thought was a bad idea, but maybe disallowing them won't actually solve anything and may exacerbate things. I don't know. I'll think about it some more.

                                    ripcord@lemmy.worldR K AndyA P 4 Replies Last reply
                                    15
                                    • ShimitarS Shimitar

                                      Wake up. Ice, being government, it's already legitimized enough in real life.

                                      What difference would it make in the social media. Better if they are out in the open in social media instead, at least they get responsible for what they post, officially.

                                      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      trickdacy@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #64

                                      What difference would it make in the social media.

                                      Apparently you slept through a fascist dictator rising to power by manipulating desperate people, specifically on social media.

                                      ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
                                      9
                                      • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                        Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

                                        The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
                                        wrote last edited by thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
                                        #65

                                        A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                                        ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
                                        7
                                        • JessicaS Jessica

                                          How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

                                          trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          trickdacy@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #66

                                          Nah tolerating intolerance has been working out well so far. I mean "free speech" is worth literally any price, and further, we should never pressure private companies to align with common morality. That's just censorship!!

                                          HUGE /s, and thank you for an actually sane take ITT.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World