Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. movies
  3. Make films shorter if you want them shown in cinemas, says Picturehouse director

Make films shorter if you want them shown in cinemas, says Picturehouse director

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved movies
22 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
    This post did not contain any content.
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    wiccan2@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    Honestly, if they cut the 40 mins of ads so it wasn't nearly 4 hours for a 3 hour movie it'd be a good start.

    3 hours is a long time to sit still and is complicated by the cinema insisting you buy their 1L "cup" of drink. They should bring back intermissions, gives them a reason to push the concessions stand more.

    For a single uninterrupted sitting, 2 hours seems like a good length and any less than 1.5 hours isn't worth it.

    koboldcoterie@pawb.socialK I 2 Replies Last reply
    31
    • C CerebralHawks

      So the cinema can get more showings in and make more money or because the younger generation can’t pay attention?

      neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
      neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
      neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      One of the best cinema experiences I've had in the last few years was going to a 10:30 am screening of The Brutalist, with an intermission and a head-up on how many ads and trailers were being shoved in before the show started.

      1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
        This post did not contain any content.
        stravanasuP This user is from outside of this forum
        stravanasuP This user is from outside of this forum
        stravanasu
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        "Keep it to 20 words or less!"
        – Saitama

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.deO opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.de

          100 minutes is the sweet spot for me. If I'm sitting in a theater longer than that, I start getting bored.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          Forget boredom, I get physically uncomfortable, even assuming I don't need to use the bathroom...

          1 Reply Last reply
          9
          • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
            This post did not contain any content.
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            Drusas
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            And reduce the ads, including trailers.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.deO opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.de

              100 minutes is the sweet spot for me. If I'm sitting in a theater longer than that, I start getting bored.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              delphia@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              I kind of get this guys point. 90 minutes for the total movie is fine, 120 is pushing it. Any longer and Ill wait and watch it at home where I can get proper comfy and pause if I need a pee.

              1 Reply Last reply
              6
              • W wiccan2@lemmy.world

                Honestly, if they cut the 40 mins of ads so it wasn't nearly 4 hours for a 3 hour movie it'd be a good start.

                3 hours is a long time to sit still and is complicated by the cinema insisting you buy their 1L "cup" of drink. They should bring back intermissions, gives them a reason to push the concessions stand more.

                For a single uninterrupted sitting, 2 hours seems like a good length and any less than 1.5 hours isn't worth it.

                koboldcoterie@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                koboldcoterie@pawb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                koboldcoterie@pawb.social
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                Honestly, if they just played the trailers before the movie is scheduled to start, I'd be much more into them. Having something to watch for the period between when you get there and the start time would be great. If anyone wanted to see more trailers, they could just arrive earlier.

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                9
                • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  circuitfarmerC This user is from outside of this forum
                  circuitfarmerC This user is from outside of this forum
                  circuitfarmer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  Ah yes, let's further reduce the art so that the dollars flow better.

                  How about starting with the 30 minutes of previews? Just don't show them.

                  Costs have to come down. Movies need to stop going on streaming a week after being in theaters.

                  This industry's death is owned by shareholders and corpos. It isn't the artists who are failing.

                  F I 2 Replies Last reply
                  13
                  • koboldcoterie@pawb.socialK koboldcoterie@pawb.social

                    Honestly, if they just played the trailers before the movie is scheduled to start, I'd be much more into them. Having something to watch for the period between when you get there and the start time would be great. If anyone wanted to see more trailers, they could just arrive earlier.

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    apollosarrow@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    But… how will we keep Maria Menounos employed if there is no more Novie to watch before the movie starts?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • C CerebralHawks

                      So the cinema can get more showings in and make more money or because the younger generation can’t pay attention?

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      cannonfodder@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      And us older generation can't hold our piss that long.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • circuitfarmerC circuitfarmer

                        Ah yes, let's further reduce the art so that the dollars flow better.

                        How about starting with the 30 minutes of previews? Just don't show them.

                        Costs have to come down. Movies need to stop going on streaming a week after being in theaters.

                        This industry's death is owned by shareholders and corpos. It isn't the artists who are failing.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        FishFace
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        They're talking about films that are over 3h30 in runtime. There's real data showing that films are creeping up in length
                        image

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • C CerebralHawks

                          So the cinema can get more showings in and make more money or because the younger generation can’t pay attention?

                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                          FishFace
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          RTFA, they talk about it. Yes, it's so they can get more showings in... than one in an evening, which longer films force them to cut down to.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • circuitfarmerC circuitfarmer

                            Ah yes, let's further reduce the art so that the dollars flow better.

                            How about starting with the 30 minutes of previews? Just don't show them.

                            Costs have to come down. Movies need to stop going on streaming a week after being in theaters.

                            This industry's death is owned by shareholders and corpos. It isn't the artists who are failing.

                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            iww4@lemmy.zip
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            Or here is an idea..

                            Just give up on test Cinema. Going to the cinema is not how movies are consumed anymore.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • W wiccan2@lemmy.world

                              Honestly, if they cut the 40 mins of ads so it wasn't nearly 4 hours for a 3 hour movie it'd be a good start.

                              3 hours is a long time to sit still and is complicated by the cinema insisting you buy their 1L "cup" of drink. They should bring back intermissions, gives them a reason to push the concessions stand more.

                              For a single uninterrupted sitting, 2 hours seems like a good length and any less than 1.5 hours isn't worth it.

                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              iww4@lemmy.zip
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              It really wont make a difference to me. There is nothing that can make me go to the theater more.

                              There is nothing that movie makers can do that can compete with my living room.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                rose56R This user is from outside of this forum
                                rose56R This user is from outside of this forum
                                rose56
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                Bro, no! A story is a story, and the one making a movie can do what ever he wants, if this 2 hours or 30 minutes or 1 hour. Not all perfect movies are Short.

                                Brave Little Hitachi WandY 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  melsaskca@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  I guess it's time to change the name of Fuddruckers.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • TheImpressiveXT TheImpressiveX
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mthomsonkiwi
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Considering there's often 30 minutes of advertising, perhaps they should cut that. Most of the cinema showings I've been too are lucky if there are 10 people in there. Cinema advertising made sense when we were growing up and the theatre was packed for weeks for a movie, but not anymore. Now it's just 30 minutes of annoyance. But sure the movie runtime is the problem.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rose56R rose56

                                      Bro, no! A story is a story, and the one making a movie can do what ever he wants, if this 2 hours or 30 minutes or 1 hour. Not all perfect movies are Short.

                                      Brave Little Hitachi WandY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Brave Little Hitachi WandY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Brave Little Hitachi Wand
                                      wrote last edited by yakko@feddit.uk
                                      #22

                                      A story is a story, but the 90 minute format was a standard for a good reason. If you're not sticking to a three act structure, use whatever time format you like. Just make sure you're using the audience's time respectfully. I'll forgive a 90 minute 'meh' movie far easier than one that took 200 minutes.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World