Blizzard reportedly partnering with Arc Raiders owner Nexon to revive StarCraft as a shooter
-
Sure, why the heck not
/pic1487287.jpg)
-
Give us Ghost you cowards.
-
Weird idea but bear with me: They could, and this will shock some of you, I hope you're sitting in a safe position ... They could revive Starcraft as fucking Starcraft!
-
Question will be if there's going to be a single player component. Back then StarCraft had a beloved universe and characters. Post StarCraft 2 - the universe and those beloved characters aren't so beloved anymore. SC2 and expansions may have been worse than Veilguard for their fanbases in terms of universal disappointment over the stories
Was it really so poorly received? I gotta admit I enjoyed SC2 and was happy to finish out the story, but was much less critical of games etc in my younger years, and have not gone back to play it again since. The ending on diablo 3 though, boy was I unimpressed.
-
So are they going to do another game thats pretty much just a reskin like when they turned that chinese mobile game into a diablo game?
-
After everything they've done to their other key franchises... Surely no one is going to fall for this, right?
-
I want an awesome RTS, like Wings of Liberty, but I would absolutely play a StarCraft shooter with a really good story and gameplay. I have zero interest in another Overwatch or extraction shooter. I expect another low-effort reskin.
-
I want an awesome RTS, like Wings of Liberty, but I would absolutely play a StarCraft shooter with a really good story and gameplay. I have zero interest in another Overwatch or extraction shooter. I expect another low-effort reskin.
Firing up the new Starcraft shooter, the female voice in your coms says: "Run down this hallway, you're going to need to prove you know how to crouch and jump over obstacles before you can learn how to switch weapon modes!"
yeah, I am gonna need something really special to get excited about another FPS shooter no matter what the wallpaper looks like.
-
Is it gonna be pay-to-win?
Pay to buy, pay to play, pay to get upgrades, pay to get the best ending, pay to not play. (You will have to use premium currency to set the game down for more than a day or lose all progress.)
-
You can play it on the original Xbox, there was a leak maybe 2020 of a prerelease / wip.
I should grab some screencaptures of the ingame, but I'm sure there are plenty out there.
-
So are they going to do another game thats pretty much just a reskin like when they turned that chinese mobile game into a diablo game?
Do you guys not have phones?
-
ZeroSpace you're our only hope. Please be the Tempest Rising to Command and Conquer that StarCraft needs.
First time hearing about this. It sure looks promising.
-
After everything they've done to their other key franchises... Surely no one is going to fall for this, right?
Do you even cell phone bro?
-
Let's take something arguably genre defining and turn it into a fad chaser! Great idea.
Let’s take everything the fans love about Starcraft and throw it away. Once we have a soulless aesthetic husk remaining we can slap it in to any piece of shit and count on nostalgia to bring in the buyers!
-
StarCraft Brood War pro scene is still going strong! I encourage anyone curious about SC to dip back into the active pro scene. A new season of ASL (GSL of old) is going to start in the next month, or so. And for the sickos, Artosis has a daily YouTube of matches. His enthusiasm is unmatched.
-
"Now with less SA" -Blizzard, probably.
Saudi Arabia or Sexual Assault?
-
Blizzard hasn't been good since they sold out to Activision.
-
You’re arguing against a position nobody stated. My criticism isn’t that an IP ever appears in another genre. It is the pattern of publishers repurposing established strategy franchises into monetization-friendly live-service shooters because that market is larger and more predictable.
Warhammer is a poor comparison. Games like Vermintide didn’t replace or redefine Warhammer; they existed alongside a still-supported core genre identity. The RTS space around StarCraft has effectively been abandoned for years. So when the first meaningful revival rumor turns out to be a shooter, I read it less as expansion and more as substitution.
If Blizzard announced a new RTS and also a shooter spin-off, I would not be critical. The reaction is about genre displacement, not genre diversification.
So you would rather get no Starcraft games than get a Starcraft game that is not an RTS?
Because I don't know if you've looked at the numbers but RTS is pretty much dead. One of the biggest RTS-s of the past 5 years was a remaster of Age of Mythology and that sold less than a million units. Starcraft 3 would have to sell something like 3 million units at launch and have an estimate of hitting at least 7 million in 2 years, because ActiBliz has certain expectation for sales and those expectations far exceed what Starcraft 2 sold in its entire lifetime. Starcraft would have to sell Diablo numbers.
I'd be very surprised if we ever saw another mainline Starcraft RTS. I don't think we'll be seeing another Warcraft RTS either.
-
It‘s so funny to me that Nexon is now known as the Arc Raiders owner. They threw money at Embark Studios and had nothing to do with development otherwise so don‘t expect anything great coming out of this.
-
StarCraft Brood War pro scene is still going strong! I encourage anyone curious about SC to dip back into the active pro scene. A new season of ASL (GSL of old) is going to start in the next month, or so. And for the sickos, Artosis has a daily YouTube of matches. His enthusiasm is unmatched.
Wait a sec... Brood war is the expansion for sc1.
Are you telling me that there's still a competitive sc1 scene? Holy fuck. What are the metas even like in that game now? What level is the meta even at??
