hi to everyone that despises wafrn's tags
Uncategorized
9
Posts
4
Posters
0
Views
-
hi to everyone that despises wafrn's tags
we're working on it
codeberg.org/wafrn/wafrn/issues/73 -
hi to everyone that despises wafrn's tags
we're working on it
codeberg.org/wafrn/wafrn/issues/73@alexia
first of all: skill issue on mastodons part. they should git gud
that aside, an idea i had with outpost was to split tags into two "purposes", one as the same thing as hashtags we have now, the other as what id call "streams", which let you categorize your own posts and boosts without letting other people search for those. once you have that something along the lines of following a subset of someone's "streams" comes naturally
also, +1 on the footnotes thing. may as well make that official. and since it's a custom extension you may be able to add it to boosts as well -
@alexia
first of all: skill issue on mastodons part. they should git gud
that aside, an idea i had with outpost was to split tags into two "purposes", one as the same thing as hashtags we have now, the other as what id call "streams", which let you categorize your own posts and boosts without letting other people search for those. once you have that something along the lines of following a subset of someone's "streams" comes naturally
also, +1 on the footnotes thing. may as well make that official. and since it's a custom extension you may be able to add it to boosts as well@kopper
oh, we didn't even plan anything special for federation here! if you check the latest comment the idea is to include this in the post body wrapped insmalltags or something along those lines
Though...federating this in a more "explicit" manner would be interesting... -
@kopper
oh, we didn't even plan anything special for federation here! if you check the latest comment the idea is to include this in the post body wrapped insmalltags or something along those lines
Though...federating this in a more "explicit" manner would be interesting...@kopper anyways yeah skill issue on mastodon's part or whatever, but we're primarily doing this because people on fedi dislike our approach, not because of software fuckups
Although, it DOES make things easier for us nonetheless -
@kopper
oh, we didn't even plan anything special for federation here! if you check the latest comment the idea is to include this in the post body wrapped insmalltags or something along those lines
Though...federating this in a more "explicit" manner would be interesting... -
-
hi to everyone that despises wafrn's tags
we're working on it
codeberg.org/wafrn/wafrn/issues/73@alexia wafrn is really coming together!! really proud of u
-
@kopper @oli
It does, it was IIRC originally intended so that wafrn-to-wafrn could show the correct tags, but we're phasing out the idea of using tags as a way to provide subtext/footnotes/a PS. section/extra thoughts as part of this redesign
We probably won't make spaces and such impossible in the tags field, though. -
@kopper @oli
It does, it was IIRC originally intended so that wafrn-to-wafrn could show the correct tags, but we're phasing out the idea of using tags as a way to provide subtext/footnotes/a PS. section/extra thoughts as part of this redesign
We probably won't make spaces and such impossible in the tags field, though.@alexia @kopper nono, we're talking about a namespace for wafrn's activityStreams extensions, like how we have ns.mia.jetzt/as/#Bite
