Piefed admin settings that allow to enable or disable content filters (they are disabled by default, see body for details)
-
How could Piefed make this disparity of blocking philosophy mesh with Lemmys here? If Rimu thinks that a block is a block, and that users who are blocked should not be able to go on replying to the user who blocked them, then I don't see why he would carry comments just because they come from Lemmy.
Correct. But even if there was no ideological dispute here (he also disliked the development cycle and choices - I don't want to make too many assumptions here), rimu may still have made his own reddit clone or someone else may have - which would handle things very differently.
How could Piefed make this disparity of blocking philosophy mesh with Lemmys here?
Without forcing every server to adopt the same blocking system universally? It can't. What it's doing now is functionally no different than if they hid replies on the user front end for users blocking others outside the home instance, except instead of doing this non-destructively (and preserving data pairety across instances), they've decided to blow huge holes in the federation service that are no longer mirrored on the other instances.
If the piefed method of handling blocking is to make it impossible for all users in every instance incapable of replying to a user who has blocked them, then every server would need to adopt the same method universally. Piefed has every right to hide content from their users that their users have chosen to block, but doing so by rejecting that content for the whole server while the rest of the network carries on ends up creating shadow forums on every instance.
rimu may still have made his own reddit clone or someone else may have - which would handle things very differently
That would be preferable to the 'embrace, extend, extinguish' path that they are currently on.
-
How could Piefed make this disparity of blocking philosophy mesh with Lemmys here?
Without forcing every server to adopt the same blocking system universally? It can't. What it's doing now is functionally no different than if they hid replies on the user front end for users blocking others outside the home instance, except instead of doing this non-destructively (and preserving data pairety across instances), they've decided to blow huge holes in the federation service that are no longer mirrored on the other instances.
If the piefed method of handling blocking is to make it impossible for all users in every instance incapable of replying to a user who has blocked them, then every server would need to adopt the same method universally. Piefed has every right to hide content from their users that their users have chosen to block, but doing so by rejecting that content for the whole server while the rest of the network carries on ends up creating shadow forums on every instance.
rimu may still have made his own reddit clone or someone else may have - which would handle things very differently
That would be preferable to the 'embrace, extend, extinguish' path that they are currently on.
Without forcing every server to adopt the same blocking system universally? It can’t.
Right, so it should be on Piefed to accept Lemmy's blocking system even if Rimu disagrees with it?
If the piefed method of handling blocking is to make it impossible for all users in every instance incapable of replying to a user who has blocked them, then every server would need to adopt the same method universally. Piefed has every right to hide content from their users that their users have chosen to block, but doing so by rejecting that content for the whole server while the rest of the network carries on ends up creating shadow forums on every instance.
This doesn't bother me that much primarily because defederation differences can cause this anyway.
That would be preferable to the ‘embrace, extend, extinguish’ path that they are currently on.
If a hypothetical lemmy-alternative existed, regardless of why, it could still cause disruption in all kinds of ways if there's a fundamental design contradiction ethos.
-
Without forcing every server to adopt the same blocking system universally? It can’t.
Right, so it should be on Piefed to accept Lemmy's blocking system even if Rimu disagrees with it?
If the piefed method of handling blocking is to make it impossible for all users in every instance incapable of replying to a user who has blocked them, then every server would need to adopt the same method universally. Piefed has every right to hide content from their users that their users have chosen to block, but doing so by rejecting that content for the whole server while the rest of the network carries on ends up creating shadow forums on every instance.
This doesn't bother me that much primarily because defederation differences can cause this anyway.
That would be preferable to the ‘embrace, extend, extinguish’ path that they are currently on.
If a hypothetical lemmy-alternative existed, regardless of why, it could still cause disruption in all kinds of ways if there's a fundamental design contradiction ethos.
If a hypothetical lemmy-alternative existed, regardless of why, it could still cause disruption in all kinds of ways if there’s a fundamental design contradiction ethos
Which is why it's important for users to reject attempts at splitting the network into different codebases in the firstplace.
That piefed and many of its users reject working with lemmy devs on principle over political grievance doesn't change or justify the fact that they are destroying the democratic nature of the federated network they're taking advantage of.
This doesn’t bother me that much primarily because defederation differences can cause this anyway
Which is why defederation is a last resort and usually requires some democratic discussion as an instance. Same with instance-banning users - that ability is limited to admins, which means users can hold them accountable if there's abuse. It's a reason why i consider users who go out of their way to foment division against other instances or users over petty disagreements to be caustic and unwelcome, but are at least still working within a decentralized and democratic framework. When any user has the ability to create the same kind of holes in the network, all accountability vanishes and it starts to look like swiss-cheese.
-
If a hypothetical lemmy-alternative existed, regardless of why, it could still cause disruption in all kinds of ways if there’s a fundamental design contradiction ethos
Which is why it's important for users to reject attempts at splitting the network into different codebases in the firstplace.
That piefed and many of its users reject working with lemmy devs on principle over political grievance doesn't change or justify the fact that they are destroying the democratic nature of the federated network they're taking advantage of.
This doesn’t bother me that much primarily because defederation differences can cause this anyway
Which is why defederation is a last resort and usually requires some democratic discussion as an instance. Same with instance-banning users - that ability is limited to admins, which means users can hold them accountable if there's abuse. It's a reason why i consider users who go out of their way to foment division against other instances or users over petty disagreements to be caustic and unwelcome, but are at least still working within a decentralized and democratic framework. When any user has the ability to create the same kind of holes in the network, all accountability vanishes and it starts to look like swiss-cheese.
Which is why it’s important for users to reject attempts at splitting the network into different codebases in the firstplace.
It is what it is. Mbin also existed before Piefed.
That piefed and many of its users reject working with lemmy devs on principle over political grievance doesn’t change or justify the fact that they are destroying the democratic nature of the federated network they’re taking advantage of.
You're assuming some hand has been offered that has been slapped away by Rimu. I'm not aware of this. I'm pretty sure they have shared information about things in the past.
Which is why defederation is a last resort and usually requires some democratic discussion as an instance. Same with instance-banning users - that ability is limited to admins, which means users can hold them accountable if there’s abuse. It’s a reason why i consider users who go out of their way to foment division against other instances or users over petty disagreements are caustic and unwelcome, but are at least still working within a decentralized and democratic framework. When any user has the ability to create the same kind of holes in the network, all accountability vanishes and it starts to look like swiss-cheese.
I mean yes, and no (depends on the instance), that's true but you know as well as I do three instances of note are heavy defederated (hilariouschaos being the third incase you were wondering). Plenty of smaller sloppy attempts also get defederated fast too, usually stuff like maga.place.
-
Which is why it’s important for users to reject attempts at splitting the network into different codebases in the firstplace.
It is what it is. Mbin also existed before Piefed.
That piefed and many of its users reject working with lemmy devs on principle over political grievance doesn’t change or justify the fact that they are destroying the democratic nature of the federated network they’re taking advantage of.
You're assuming some hand has been offered that has been slapped away by Rimu. I'm not aware of this. I'm pretty sure they have shared information about things in the past.
Which is why defederation is a last resort and usually requires some democratic discussion as an instance. Same with instance-banning users - that ability is limited to admins, which means users can hold them accountable if there’s abuse. It’s a reason why i consider users who go out of their way to foment division against other instances or users over petty disagreements are caustic and unwelcome, but are at least still working within a decentralized and democratic framework. When any user has the ability to create the same kind of holes in the network, all accountability vanishes and it starts to look like swiss-cheese.
I mean yes, and no (depends on the instance), that's true but you know as well as I do three instances of note are heavy defederated (hilariouschaos being the third incase you were wondering). Plenty of smaller sloppy attempts also get defederated fast too, usually stuff like maga.place.
It is what it is. Mbin also existed before Piefed.
Mbin isn't nearly as egregious as piefed in the way they introduce breaking changes to the network.
You’re assuming some hand has been offered that has been slapped away by Rimu
I'm not assuming anything, it's been stated repeatedly. Rimu could implement his preferred features in ways that don't degrade the health of the network but chooses not to.
you know as well as I do three instances of note are heavy defederated (hilariouschaos being the third incase you were wondering)
I'm not sure what relevance that has, but you can count those instances on a hand missing two fingers (i'd note that dbzer0 does not defederate from 2 of the three that I assume you're referring to, nor would I advocate for it). It would be interesting for someone to map out just how much of the fediverse is effectively being defederated for piefed servers with large user block lists - i imagine it's quite a large chunk, especially when the most popular users to block are the ones producing the most activity. The larger those servers grow, the bigger those holes will become.
-
It is what it is. Mbin also existed before Piefed.
Mbin isn't nearly as egregious as piefed in the way they introduce breaking changes to the network.
You’re assuming some hand has been offered that has been slapped away by Rimu
I'm not assuming anything, it's been stated repeatedly. Rimu could implement his preferred features in ways that don't degrade the health of the network but chooses not to.
you know as well as I do three instances of note are heavy defederated (hilariouschaos being the third incase you were wondering)
I'm not sure what relevance that has, but you can count those instances on a hand missing two fingers (i'd note that dbzer0 does not defederate from 2 of the three that I assume you're referring to, nor would I advocate for it). It would be interesting for someone to map out just how much of the fediverse is effectively being defederated for piefed servers with large user block lists - i imagine it's quite a large chunk, especially when the most popular users to block are the ones producing the most activity. The larger those servers grow, the bigger those holes will become.
Mbin isn’t nearly as egregious as piefed in the way they introduce breaking changes to the network.
Is Mbin updated much?
I’m not assuming anything, it’s been stated repeatedly. Rimu could implement his preferred features in ways that don’t degrade the health of the network but chooses not to.
Have Lemmy mods approached Rimu at all?
I’m not sure what relevance that has, but you can count those instances on a hand missing two fingers (i’d note that dbzer0 does not defederate from 2 of the three that I assume you’re referring to, nor would I advocate for it). It would be interesting for someone to map out just how much of the fediverse is effectively being defederated for piefed servers with large user block lists - i imagine it’s quite a large chunk, especially when the most popular users to block are the ones producing the most activity. The larger those servers grow, the bigger those holes will become.
Just noting that there are already holes of communication due to defederation (hexbear/lemmygrad are pretty medium sized).
-
Mbin isn’t nearly as egregious as piefed in the way they introduce breaking changes to the network.
Is Mbin updated much?
I’m not assuming anything, it’s been stated repeatedly. Rimu could implement his preferred features in ways that don’t degrade the health of the network but chooses not to.
Have Lemmy mods approached Rimu at all?
I’m not sure what relevance that has, but you can count those instances on a hand missing two fingers (i’d note that dbzer0 does not defederate from 2 of the three that I assume you’re referring to, nor would I advocate for it). It would be interesting for someone to map out just how much of the fediverse is effectively being defederated for piefed servers with large user block lists - i imagine it’s quite a large chunk, especially when the most popular users to block are the ones producing the most activity. The larger those servers grow, the bigger those holes will become.
Just noting that there are already holes of communication due to defederation (hexbear/lemmygrad are pretty medium sized).
Have Lemmy mods approached Rimu at all?
He chose to fork his own code rather than work with them - I think the better question is why he hasnt vetted his changes with the existing codebase better, or why he cant be bothered.
-
Have Lemmy mods approached Rimu at all?
He chose to fork his own code rather than work with them - I think the better question is why he hasnt vetted his changes with the existing codebase better, or why he cant be bothered.
So in your mind just the existence of an alternative platform that reads Lemmy instances here is in itself evidence of a problem? It seems like that to me.
I haven't seen a single instance owner (on piefed or lemmy) complain about the interpretation of the block system as developed by piefed so far.
-
This is some LLM-level of analysis right there (Lemmygrad.ml and hexbear.net are blocked from many instances, and people often lump lemmy.ml together into a triad, hence lemmy.ml must be automatically blocked as well!).
I'm the author of the comment you quoted, and even though you didn't reply to me, I'd like to say that I assumed so because of this.
Edit: I was wrong about this, here is the default defederation list. For those who interested in what the linked part does, see https://lemmy.ml/post/42415919/23664761.
Lemmy users be like “why can’t we all get along…”, yet feel absolutely free to criticize every tiny aspect
I disagree with the previous commenter attitude. But personally I don't think it's bad to discuss things we don't like if the discussion is healthy.
ignoring how e.g. lemmy.ml kicks people out of communities
Who is ignoring it? I think it was widely discussed on the Fediverse.
LMAO! At this point I'm pretty sure OpenStars has all of Lemmy.ml blocked, cuz your comment never showed up!
-
LMAO! At this point I'm pretty sure OpenStars has all of Lemmy.ml blocked, cuz your comment never showed up!
The quoted comment is for a different post: https://lemmy.ml/post/42339089/23675448
So I was surprised to see it being mentioned here.
-
The quoted comment is for a different post: https://lemmy.ml/post/42339089/23675448
So I was surprised to see it being mentioned here.
No I mean your reply to OpenStars didn't show up on piefed.social, because OpenStars has Lemmy.ml blocked, see RedWizards comment on how blocking functions on piefed.
-
No I mean your reply to OpenStars didn't show up on piefed.social, because OpenStars has Lemmy.ml blocked, see RedWizards comment on how blocking functions on piefed.
Ah, makes sense!
-
Edit about the 4chan image blocking, I asked Rimu directly:
I wrote a long message about how that checkbox only notifies about federated posts.
So the difference is for local posts it blocks the creation of the post entirely, but for federated posts it just notifies the admin.
https://chat.piefed.social/#narrow/channel/3-general/topic//near/10529
--
Original message:A few people in the other thread assumed that it was required to fork the code to disable those filters. That's not the case, the filters can be configured, and are off by default.
To hide the reputation system, here's a line of CSS that admins can add in the admin area to hide it for every user
That CSS line can also be used by any user wanting to hide the score at the user level.
"You can be pretty sure anyone with 1488 or even just 88 in their user name is a nazi, for example.
Speaking of which, PieFed has an optional approval queue for new registrations. New accounts with “88” in their name are always put in a different /dev/null queue that leads nowhere. The UI tells them they’re waiting for approval but that approval will never come."
https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/
This is ham-fisted.
People born in 1988 or August 8th or people of east asian descent might all like the number 88 or 888888
![∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/1adef085-c064-4ad2-9fc8-1c860e1aaab6.webp "∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]"){kind=avatar}
