Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Games
  3. Over 50% of game developers now think generative AI is bad for the industry, a dramatic increase from just 2 years ago: 'I'd rather quit the industry than use generative AI'

Over 50% of game developers now think generative AI is bad for the industry, a dramatic increase from just 2 years ago: 'I'd rather quit the industry than use generative AI'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Games
games
23 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M MotoAsh

    There are many problems "AI" solves. It's an excellent tool ... for dynamic interfaces, or doing low-risk automation that has very dynamic inputs, or data analysis...

    What it's NOT good at is being creative or logical. It literally cannot do either of those things. Ever. Yet that's what every fucking brainless executive is trying to use it for...

    J This user is from outside of this forum
    J This user is from outside of this forum
    jeebaichow@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    That version of 'ai' that solves stuff is usually rooted in more traditional computing methods and concepts of ai, than what theyre currently throwing money at, though.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M MotoAsh

      lol good job advertising your own abysmal media literacy...

      L This user is from outside of this forum
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      lofuw@sh.itjust.works
      wrote last edited by lofuw@sh.itjust.works
      #22

      Yeah, Charlie Kaufman is actually the one who mentioned AI being able to take the place of hollywood writers because they're all so shit and fans have no standards.

      https://consequence.net/2023/08/charlie-kaufman-ai-garbage-sag-aftra-strike/

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jeebaichow@lemmy.world

        That version of 'ai' that solves stuff is usually rooted in more traditional computing methods and concepts of ai, than what theyre currently throwing money at, though.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        MotoAsh
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        Not really. It's still just a pile of linear algebra. That's why it doesn't think or reason or actually understand what it's outputting.

        That's why all this chasing by executives is a MASSIVE folly: The tech is literally incapable of doing what they think it can.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • 1
        • 2
        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World