James Cameron Says He Must Find a Cheaper Way to Produce the Avatar Movies in Order to Continue With Avatar 4 and 5 - IGN
-
I had the same feeling after the first one after delaying watching it for 15 years. It's really not a good movie. I don't get the hype.
...it was the first (and one of the few) well-produced modern 3D film and mustered a plurality of its box office return on the hype surrounding that novelty...
-
They also had the same bad guy for 3 movies...
And he got away again, I couldn't believe it!
-
This post did not contain any content.
I have an idea: cut the film length in half, remove the warfare and turn it into a nature documentary.
My mom really likes the movies, so I went with her to the cinema. I like the progress in CGI and have read their papers on water rendering a bunch of times, and I can feel myself getting immersed when things start off. They are beautiful worlds with so much creativity!
And then the warfare starts and it all turns into a CGI mess with no story value. Such a disappointment.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It’s easy to joke about, but I feel like this is a microcosm of the problems plaguing Hollywood. The notion that a franchise routinely closing in on $2B a movie at the box office is somehow not profitable speaks to how absolutely unhinged the budgets are going in.
-
And he got away again, I couldn't believe it!
Wait for real?! Good thing I didn’t bother to watch 3 yet, after the end of 2 was just setting up yet another rematch.
-
Wait for real?! Good thing I didn’t bother to watch 3 yet, after the end of 2 was just setting up yet another rematch.
Yep. Many parts of 3 were a literal repeat of 2, including whale hunting, a big showdown at the water village, and Quarritch AGAIN gets away at the end.
-
I sat and watched, didn't feel to bored, very surprised actually, but the test is, I feel, how much money would I accept to go watch it again? I think it would be quite painful.
I watched it three times and enjoyed it more each time.
-
One of the easiest cost cutting moves in franchise movie making is replacing expensive talent.
Why pay Sam Worthington or Zoe Saldana 30-45 mill each when you can get up and coming talent for 5 or lessI actually think this is a great idea. Saldana did a great job though. And Worthington was fine.
Edit: nobody's showing up for Worthington though. No offense to him.
-
This post did not contain any content.
He could make blue giant dildos for merch, and simultaneously go fuck himself with one of those.
-
He could probably do a nature documentary set in that world for cheap and people would pay to see it.
It would spare us the tiresome dialog.
-
If there's a single dollar giant corporations and billionaires don't have, they'll destroy your life to get it. That's why their limitless greed is so dangerous to everyone, it's quite literally never enough...
-
Dude it’s okay, you can stop, in fact many of us prefer you do
As long as it makes as much money as it does, I think we're in the minority.
-
It’s easy to joke about, but I feel like this is a microcosm of the problems plaguing Hollywood. The notion that a franchise routinely closing in on $2B a movie at the box office is somehow not profitable speaks to how absolutely unhinged the budgets are going in.
Everything about movies is just stupid. Napoleon dynamite cost 400k to make. Half of that money went into the jamiroquai song. Marketing for a movie costs more than a movie used to cost. A movie made 10 million dollars? Absolute failure. People like the rock get paid 50million per movie to just be there. I really hope Hollywood just collapses
-
He could probably do a nature documentary set in that world for cheap and people would pay to see it.
It would spare us the tiresome dialog.
... you got me. I would certainly consider seeing that.
-
What makes you think that?
Because it is the easiest way to save monney
