Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Games
  3. Games you really want to play, but can't or won't?

Games you really want to play, but can't or won't?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Games
257 Posts 150 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • garretble@lemmy.worldG garretble@lemmy.world

    Counterpoint: Someone can play up through Stormblood without having to buy anything.

    But, yeah, I agree. I don't really want to think about how much I've spent on this one game over the last 12 years. But roughly spitballing:

    • ARR, Heavensward, Stormblood, Shadowbringers, Endwalker, Dawntrail...I'll say that's 6 x $40 (not accurate since I bought special editions for some and moved from PS3 to Pc so that's an extra cost there, too): $240
    • $13/m for 11 years (I've played ARR since launch but there have been some times where I turned off my sub for a little bit so I'll just knock off 12 months): 13 x 12 x 11 = $1,716
    • Various Mogstation purchases, roughly $40?
    • Total for me with this napkin math: $1,996

    Woof. But, I do love the game and spent all weekend playing it just now. So there's worse things to spend money on.

    GladiusBG This user is from outside of this forum
    GladiusBG This user is from outside of this forum
    GladiusB
    wrote last edited by
    #188

    This expac broke me. Played for a decade. Decent ranked tank. The new raids are more of the same and PF has no healers. Tried to play Sage to balance it out and no one could make it work.

    The game lost touch with what made it great. It's no longer innovative. The story is ass. It's just a whale hunter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kazerniel@lemmy.worldK kazerniel@lemmy.world

      Cyberpunk 2077 - it still doesn't go on steep enough sales to justify buying when I have hundreds of unplayed games on Steam. But I'm keeping an eye on its downward progress. Maybe when it reaches £10-13...

      GladiusBG This user is from outside of this forum
      GladiusBG This user is from outside of this forum
      GladiusB
      wrote last edited by
      #189

      I bought it this winter for 25. Solid beginning. Haven't finished it. But it's there. I hop on when I want to veg out and the story is pretty damn good.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • F fyrilsol

        Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

        And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

        So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        darthinvidious
        wrote last edited by
        #190

        Hollow Knight. I watched someone on YouTube play it and I just don't want to spend that much time playing that kind of game. I'm someone who grew up playing Mario 64, Mario sunshine, Mario Galaxy and I just recall spending so much time playing those games as a kid. So much time wasted. Cannot bring myself to do that again. I'm pretty stubborn and so I know because I wasted so much time on those Nintendo games that I would pull ridiculous amounts of time on another game like that. Not worth it anymore for me.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • A ameancow@lemmy.world

          I keep trying Civ VI and keep uninstalling it before finishing a single game.

          I can't put my finger on exactly what's changed since earlier games, but it's lost a lot of the addicting charm and intuitive flow that made me play prior versions for days. Also, the goofy-ass style and overly dramatic narrative starts to irk me.

          If that's the trend of the franchise I sure won't be touching any of the later ones.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          washbasin@sh.itjust.works
          wrote last edited by
          #191

          Civ V is the sweet spot.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • F fyrilsol

            Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

            And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

            So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            birch@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #192

            Any game at the moment would be nice

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • F fyrilsol

              Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

              And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

              So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

              khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK This user is from outside of this forum
              khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK This user is from outside of this forum
              khantoblackhand@lemmy.today
              wrote last edited by
              #193

              I honestly want to play skyrim on the Switch 2, but I won't because the input controls function so poorly and the framerate is subpar. I was excited for when we got the boost in power on the Switch 2 but Bethesda fumbled it. Hopefully they do fix Skyrim and that they launch Fallout 4 in a good state with a gold framerate.

              H 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F fyrilsol

                Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

                And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

                So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

                kungfuratte@feddit.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                kungfuratte@feddit.orgK This user is from outside of this forum
                kungfuratte@feddit.org
                wrote last edited by
                #194

                Even if you don't mind the online only part, ignore this abomination. They botched the D4 campaign. It's too easy and almost impossible to die during the regular campaign. It takes roughly two minutes to beat a world boss on the first play through.

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                6
                • khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK khantoblackhand@lemmy.today

                  I honestly want to play skyrim on the Switch 2, but I won't because the input controls function so poorly and the framerate is subpar. I was excited for when we got the boost in power on the Switch 2 but Bethesda fumbled it. Hopefully they do fix Skyrim and that they launch Fallout 4 in a good state with a gold framerate.

                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                  H This user is from outside of this forum
                  hafler@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #195

                  Don't you worry. With every new console release, you can accommodate guarantee that Skyrim will be on it at some point. It's like Bethesda NEEDS to release it on every single platform.... Sometimes multiple times.

                  khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • C chunes@lemmy.world

                    I'm sure there's a cheat engine invulnerability hack or something I could use, but it would kinda take the fun out of it.

                    Brave Little Hitachi WandY This user is from outside of this forum
                    Brave Little Hitachi WandY This user is from outside of this forum
                    Brave Little Hitachi Wand
                    wrote last edited by
                    #196

                    I agree. I was imagining maybe a time dilation mod that you could toggle on/off to make your inputs less physically demanding, but I don't know if that exists. That's how I'd do accessibility in this game personally. I don't know anything about your condition though, so really I'm just spitballing and daydreaming simultaneously.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H hafler@lemmy.world

                      Don't you worry. With every new console release, you can accommodate guarantee that Skyrim will be on it at some point. It's like Bethesda NEEDS to release it on every single platform.... Sometimes multiple times.

                      khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK This user is from outside of this forum
                      khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK This user is from outside of this forum
                      khantoblackhand@lemmy.today
                      wrote last edited by
                      #197

                      Oh Skyrim is on the Switch 2. But it runs so poorly and it's so unoptimized that it makes it not worth the Switch 2 version upgrade. I'm just going to wait and see if they re-release it again haha.

                      MrScottyTayM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E evotech@lemmy.world

                        Just play at a low level and have fun

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fatvegan@leminal.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #198

                        The problem with low level Deadlock is that you end up in games with people who have never played before. The game got way better when I reached high ranks. Now i'm at a cataclysmic losing streak and i'm back to low ranks. It can be brutal.

                        E 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kazerniel@lemmy.worldK kazerniel@lemmy.world

                          Cyberpunk 2077 - it still doesn't go on steep enough sales to justify buying when I have hundreds of unplayed games on Steam. But I'm keeping an eye on its downward progress. Maybe when it reaches £10-13...

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          agentrocket@feddit.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #199

                          That's my strategy as well. Whenever Witcher 3 is on sale i think to myself "Can't wait for Cyberpunk to get that low". Same thing for Elden Ring +DLC, except there i would be willing to pay about 30-40 bucks.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ascendor@discuss.tchncs.deA ascendor@discuss.tchncs.de

                            Elite Dangerous. Extremely beautiful, especially impressive in VR - but way too time-consuming for me.

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                            wrote last edited by
                            #200

                            why did they skip VR compatibility for the on foot sections of the game? seems insane

                            horseH 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F fyrilsol

                              Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

                              And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

                              So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              J This user is from outside of this forum
                              jumi@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #201

                              AC Shadows

                              I want to play it but fuck Ubisoft

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              6
                              • khantoblackhand@lemmy.todayK khantoblackhand@lemmy.today

                                Oh Skyrim is on the Switch 2. But it runs so poorly and it's so unoptimized that it makes it not worth the Switch 2 version upgrade. I'm just going to wait and see if they re-release it again haha.

                                MrScottyTayM This user is from outside of this forum
                                MrScottyTayM This user is from outside of this forum
                                MrScottyTay
                                wrote last edited by
                                #202

                                Skyrim Remastered: Definitive Special Edition - Nintendo Switch 2 Version

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • M mrdrprof@lemmy.ca

                                  MGO2! Spent some effort trying to get it to work and now the game won't update to the latest version

                                  MrScottyTayM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  MrScottyTayM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  MrScottyTay
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #203

                                  Metal Gear Online 2? Didn't know that was still playable

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F fyrilsol

                                    Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

                                    And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

                                    So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

                                    U This user is from outside of this forum
                                    U This user is from outside of this forum
                                    underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #204

                                    Bloodborne

                                    The last console I owned was a PS3, and I don't plan on ever having another. Sony thankfully mostly got with the program and released a bunch of their stuff on PC, but Bloodborne remains a standout.

                                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • A ameancow@lemmy.world

                                      I keep trying Civ VI and keep uninstalling it before finishing a single game.

                                      I can't put my finger on exactly what's changed since earlier games, but it's lost a lot of the addicting charm and intuitive flow that made me play prior versions for days. Also, the goofy-ass style and overly dramatic narrative starts to irk me.

                                      If that's the trend of the franchise I sure won't be touching any of the later ones.

                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                                      demdaru@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #205

                                      If that's the trend of the franchise I sure won't be touching any of the later ones.

                                      Good news! It's prolly not. In an interview I've read quite some time ago, creators said that they hit a silly problem of not having path of improving the game because everything works and...well, not much to add.

                                      So instead they experiment slightly with each version, making small changes every time to create another "flavor" of Civ.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • F fyrilsol

                                        Diablo IV, for me. I love the Diablo series and just a bit ago, I sank 2 hours down to get my necromancer character up and set in Diablo II Resurrection. I have Diablo III and its expansion too, but they're online only and I almost can't be bothered to go through that. I've beaten it a long time ago.

                                        And I really do want to get Diablo IV, but they've made that online-only as well. Like, I know I'm always online and everything but I do like to have that fallback where if I am without internet or I can't afford internet for a time, I can play or watch things to bide the time over. I can't do that with online-only games because it's like being gated away from something you bought.

                                        So everytime I look at Diablo IV, I just get a little depressed at times. Blizzard should do what D2R did, have an online character and have an offline character.

                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        don_alforno@feddit.org
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #206

                                        The newer Anno installments. I'm not buying another Ubisoft game unless they get rid of their stupid Launcher, and I'm also not buying anything with Denuvo and similar BS.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • A ameancow@lemmy.world

                                          I'd love to play Baldur's Gate 3 with a diverse group of real people and share an adventure together, but have no friends who enjoy games that aren't mindless slop.

                                          Same with other slow-burn games like Project Zomboid and other survival/crafting games.

                                          I learned to do slop to hang out with others, I even got good at slop like Rivals just to keep social contact alive. But I can't drag anyone into a game that doesn't have 2-minute matches filled with flashing lights and colors and gambling mini-games.

                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fyrilsol
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #207

                                          Sorry you've been through that.

                                          I've about given up on chasing multiplayer, even including friends. It never fails. Because, there would be times some friends I know are playing a multiplayer game that is big and they're all involved and I want to be involved. Then by the time I get it, they've moved on to something else and it would be a chore to have tried and get them to come back to the game I just got so we can have some of our memories poured into it.

                                          It would never happen, they've grounded their footing into that next game and I would be a little begrudged and eventually I'd get that game, only for the cycle to repeat.

                                          So, I've stopped doing that. Now I have a bunch of all of these games that were fun to have played with people on, just sitting and collecting dust because I tried playing with people I know and cared about. Now most of them play FFXIV, Escape from Tarkov or some other MMO-like game and they know I won't go there to them because I'm not a MMO player, but I was always open to play something else that was multiplayer, but they never bit.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 7
                                          • 8
                                          • 9
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • 12
                                          • 13
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World