I wish though they were a bit more friendly towards Proton/Wine. Knowing what games are compatible and to what degree before purchasing them would make me happier.

Well they’re some random person expressing their opinion as well. Why are you denying them the same right you claim?

Corollary: All news are old news.

I used an example of two technologies that were destructive and inevitable, now both definitely parts of your daily life, to show how silly it is take a stance against a technology like that. I don't need to work at GOG for that to be the case. And to reiterate, AI might not be inevitable. If it's not, this problem takes care of itself economically, and you don't need to shame anyone.

If you think you’re immune to that, you’re an idiot.

Yeah, but they gotta make sure everyone knows they have an opinion, lest you forget they exist

trust thsir own feelings over facts

Can I take a guess that you are not currently employed in the software development industry?

enthusiasm for helping the team increase adoption

Seems like they want to hire an AI salesman, not an engineer.

That's not an answer to my question.

I believe I did answer your question, though I'd disagree with the idea that I'm "defending" anything. There exists nuance between "pro AI" and "anti AI".

Questioning motives is denying?

When you say, “I’m just expressing an opinion, why are you doing the same”, then yes, it is denying them the same right. Don’t play games with me, we’re not the idiots you seem to think we are.

If making art is the process of getting something inspired in your head into the physical world, then it would make one an artist. AI would be a tool to achieve that.

Many people still don't consider digital artists to be artists because they use tools that make it easier than physical art.

I'm not arguing that using AI makes me a software developer. I'm saying that as a software developer, I seek to use the best tools for the job, just like any other job.

"We"

Is Sam Altman in the room with you right now?

So artists, wanting to use what you describe as the best tool for the job, should just use AI? How even is AI the best tool? This is an inane and pointless argument with a drug addict defending heroin.

What‘s the good company in this context?

We had all of those things before AI and they worked just fine and didn't require 50 Exowatts of electricity to run.

None of what you brought up as a positive are things an LLM does. Most of those things existed before the modern transformer-based LLMs were even a thing.

LLM-s are glorified text prediction engines and nothing about their nature makes them excel at formal languages. It doesn't know any rules. It doesn't have any internal logic. For example if the training data consistently exhibits the same flawed piece of code then an LLM will spit out the same flawed piece of code, because that's the most likely continuation of its current "train of thought". You would have to fine-tune the model around all those flaws and then hope some combination of a prompt won't lead the model back into that flawed data.

I've used LLMs to generate SQL, which according to you is something they should excel at, and I've had to fix literal syntax errors that would prevent the statement from executing. A regular SQL linter would instantly pick up that the SQL is wrong but an LLM can't pick up those errors because an LLM does not understand the syntax.

Is that what art is? Who doesn't consider digital artists to be artists? Point some out.