Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Bluesky just verified ICE

Bluesky just verified ICE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
203 Posts 90 Posters 112 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    This post did not contain any content.
    ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
    ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
    Shimitar
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    (Not American here)

    While i agree fediverse is then solution and i don't use bluesky, i don't see the issue is recognizing ICE as verified.

    After all ice is a government agency of the USA whether you like it or not, and should be verified if there is a procedure to do so.

    No i don't like ice and i do not condone what they do, but that doesn't change the above statement.

    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG LeonD 2 Replies Last reply
    238
    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      This post did not contain any content.
      rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
      rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
      rglullis@communick.news
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

      Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

      E B hansolo@lemmy.todayH flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)F CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]C 6 Replies Last reply
      88
      • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

        It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

        Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

        E This user is from outside of this forum
        E This user is from outside of this forum
        Echo Dot
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        Yeah I really don't see why everyone is upset about this. Should be upset that ICE exists but not but they have an official bluesky account. This is basically the same as going "yep they're real".

        This is just more weird Mastodon elitism.

        1 Reply Last reply
        55
        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          This post did not contain any content.
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          syndication@lemmy.today
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          Isn't the whole point of the verification checkmark is to make sure nobody impersonate well known people/organizations? I know Twitter eventually turned it into a whole cash grab subscription and ruined the concept, but on most other platforms it isn't treated like some premium subscription and is just a means of knowing who is who.

          S H J 3 Replies Last reply
          45
          • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

            It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

            Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            balsoft@lemmy.ml
            wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
            #6

            It's better if the nazis were permabanned from their indexer thingy. Otherwise it's just a nazi bar.

            Imagine if in the 30s, some newspaper allowed the Gestapo to run ads and write an opinion column. Would you be defending them?

            rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
            10
            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
              This post did not contain any content.
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              wrote last edited by borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              #7

              Not that big of a deal IMHO; it’s what verification is for, unlike X’s blue check model.

              Obligatory fuck ICE.

              1 Reply Last reply
              20
              • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

                It's better if the nazis were permabanned from their indexer thingy. Otherwise it's just a nazi bar.

                Imagine if in the 30s, some newspaper allowed the Gestapo to run ads and write an opinion column. Would you be defending them?

                rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                rglullis@communick.news
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                Labeling the account as verified and excluding/not excluding from the AppView are two separate actions.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                14
                • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                  LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                  Leon
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  The new corporate platform is just as problematic as the old corporate platform made by the same person? Wow, what a revelation.

                  irelephant [he/him]I 1 Reply Last reply
                  12
                  • S syndication@lemmy.today

                    Isn't the whole point of the verification checkmark is to make sure nobody impersonate well known people/organizations? I know Twitter eventually turned it into a whole cash grab subscription and ruined the concept, but on most other platforms it isn't treated like some premium subscription and is just a means of knowing who is who.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    Not a new debate at all… https://xkcd.com/1914/ and the context for that was https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/twitter-suspends-verifying-accounts-giving-154625015.html

                    I agree that if "verification" is going to be a thing, it should only mean the person or organization is who they claim to be, not imply endorsement of any of their activities.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    10
                    • ShimitarS Shimitar

                      (Not American here)

                      While i agree fediverse is then solution and i don't use bluesky, i don't see the issue is recognizing ICE as verified.

                      After all ice is a government agency of the USA whether you like it or not, and should be verified if there is a procedure to do so.

                      No i don't like ice and i do not condone what they do, but that doesn't change the above statement.

                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

                      L photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comP HanrahanH C ShimitarS 5 Replies Last reply
                      23
                      • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                        Labeling the account as verified and excluding/not excluding from the AppView are two separate actions.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        balsoft@lemmy.ml
                        wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                        #12

                        It is a clear indication that they don't intend to ban the account, they have verified it on their own server. They are two separate actions, but one implies that the other will not be done.

                        And in any case, I'm pointing out that the dichotomy between "verify ICE and let them post nazi propaganda officially" and "let ICE post nazi propaganda with plausible deniability" is false, they can (should) just ban them.

                        rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                        8
                        • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

                          It is a clear indication that they don't intend to ban the account, they have verified it on their own server. They are two separate actions, but one implies that the other will not be done.

                          And in any case, I'm pointing out that the dichotomy between "verify ICE and let them post nazi propaganda officially" and "let ICE post nazi propaganda with plausible deniability" is false, they can (should) just ban them.

                          rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rglullis@communick.newsR This user is from outside of this forum
                          rglullis@communick.news
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          but one implies that the other will not be done.

                          This is false.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          5
                          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            JessicaS This user is from outside of this forum
                            JessicaS This user is from outside of this forum
                            Jessica
                            wrote last edited by sayjess@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                            #14

                            How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

                            B trickdacy@lemmy.worldT 2 Replies Last reply
                            8
                            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

                              If ICE tried to verify their account on Lemmy it would be permabanned instantly

                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              lordxdnl@literature.cafe
                              wrote last edited by lordxdnl@literature.cafe
                              #15

                              I wonder if that is acutally better though, or just as problematic in the other direction

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              9
                              • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                                but one implies that the other will not be done.

                                This is false.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                wrote last edited by balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                #16

                                Do you expect bsky to ban ICE? They already have a job posting to join the Gestapo in their profile, is that not enough?

                                Someone at bsky verification team looked at this, and instead of flagging the account to be reviewed and removed, they pressed the "verify" button. If you give them the benefit of doubt, this was a mistake from someone on the verification team, but realistically speaking a corporate platform turning into a Nazi bar is quite natural nowadays.

                                rglullis@communick.newsR 1 Reply Last reply
                                8
                                • L lordxdnl@literature.cafe

                                  I wonder if that is acutally better though, or just as problematic in the other direction

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  It is a lot better. If you let Nazis join your platform, your platform is now a Nazi bar. Ban them, don't let them spread their propaganda.

                                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                                  20
                                  • JessicaS Jessica

                                    How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

                                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    balsoft@lemmy.ml
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Bsky is actually quite centralized. Bluesky the company owns the only full-network indexer (I think they call it a "relay" or something), which collects posts from all other servers and allows those posts to be rendered by various apps (e.g. bsky.app, but all other frontends use the same indexer). They could just ban them at indexer level.

                                    But even that is moot, because they are letting them host their account on a server Bluesky the company owns, bsky.social.

                                    irelephant [he/him]I 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • B balsoft@lemmy.ml

                                      It is a lot better. If you let Nazis join your platform, your platform is now a Nazi bar. Ban them, don't let them spread their propaganda.

                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      I This user is from outside of this forum
                                      iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      They still can't post shit against the general instance rules. So they'd have to be very careful of get the nuisance of getting their posts constantly removed, and eventually banned. No need to make individual distinctions when the general rules already work.

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      4
                                      • rglullis@communick.newsR rglullis@communick.news

                                        It's a good thing they get verified. It means they can not take back anything they post and they have to take accountability for the account.

                                        Do you think it would be better if they didn't verify it and let them spread misinformation and propaganda with plausible deniability?

                                        hansolo@lemmy.todayH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansolo@lemmy.todayH This user is from outside of this forum
                                        hansolo@lemmy.today
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        I look forward to them being confronted with views they can't just ask Elon to delete.

                                        But, let's be real here, this is rage bait to track people using their first amendment rights in a way they don't love. BSKY doesn't need to give up anything on users. Users accessing BSKY ip addresses given up by their ISP will be more than enough for Palintir to find. A few links with trackers provide browser fingerprinting. Easy day for them.

                                        Be careful, y'all.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        11
                                        • ShimitarS Shimitar

                                          (Not American here)

                                          While i agree fediverse is then solution and i don't use bluesky, i don't see the issue is recognizing ICE as verified.

                                          After all ice is a government agency of the USA whether you like it or not, and should be verified if there is a procedure to do so.

                                          No i don't like ice and i do not condone what they do, but that doesn't change the above statement.

                                          LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          LeonD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Leon
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          You know that the problem isn’t that they’re verifying the gestapo, it’s that they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

                                          W D ShimitarS 3 Replies Last reply
                                          81
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 7
                                          • 8
                                          • 9
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World