Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Bluesky just verified ICE

Bluesky just verified ICE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
203 Posts 90 Posters 128 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    This post did not contain any content.
    trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
    trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
    trickdacy@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by trickdacy@lemmy.world
    #63

    Everyone responding here and confused why this matters seem not get the point. This post is just a warning that the types of people most of us don't want to associate with are now on that platform. The problem is not that they are verified, it's that they exist there at all.

    Edit: some reasonable arguments have been made here for allowing these Nazis on Blue sky, which I originally thought was a bad idea, but maybe disallowing them won't actually solve anything and may exacerbate things. I don't know. I'll think about it some more.

    ripcord@lemmy.worldR K AndyA P 4 Replies Last reply
    15
    • ShimitarS Shimitar

      Wake up. Ice, being government, it's already legitimized enough in real life.

      What difference would it make in the social media. Better if they are out in the open in social media instead, at least they get responsible for what they post, officially.

      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
      trickdacy@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #64

      What difference would it make in the social media.

      Apparently you slept through a fascist dictator rising to power by manipulating desperate people, specifically on social media.

      ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
      9
      • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

        Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

        The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
        wrote last edited by thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
        #65

        A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

        ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
        7
        • JessicaS Jessica

          How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

          trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
          trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
          trickdacy@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #66

          Nah tolerating intolerance has been working out well so far. I mean "free speech" is worth literally any price, and further, we should never pressure private companies to align with common morality. That's just censorship!!

          HUGE /s, and thank you for an actually sane take ITT.

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • A auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com

            They haven’t posted anything yet.

            ‘Official verified’ isn’t a thing on bluesky. It’s self-verification, just means you own the domain.

            Most western governments are terrorist. Can you name an administration that isn’t guilty of war crimes? Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

            trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
            trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
            trickdacy@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #67

            Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

            For companies that have morals or a backbone, abso fucking lutely

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • trickdacy@lemmy.worldT trickdacy@lemmy.world

              So?

              Any place Nazis are allowed is not a place I want to be. At least on any Lemmy server I'd not block, Nazis get banned

              R This user is from outside of this forum
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              randomgal@lemmy.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #68

              Are they banned in Mastodon? Lmao

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • T thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com

                A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                ripcord@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #69

                Which no one will read because bluesky has a really great block system

                boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                10
                • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                  Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

                  The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

                  BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
                  BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
                  Buelldozer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #70

                  Too many people thought that Twitters Blue Checkmark meant you were special. That attitude carries over to Bluesky and being verified.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  24
                  • T thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com

                    A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    wrote last edited by
                    #71

                    It's not, though. Do you think that the admins of reddthat.com endorse everything you post? Creating a public forum for people (including the representatives of organizations) to post on doesn't imply that the forum endorses any of the content those people post on it.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • ripcord@lemmy.worldR ripcord@lemmy.world

                      Which no one will read because bluesky has a really great block system

                      boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                      boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                      boiglenoight@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #72

                      Yeap. This is a provocative, reactive take that doesn’t consider much.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        general_effort@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #73

                        So, trying to parse what's going on here.

                        Bluesky has verified that an account claiming to belong to the US government agency ICE really is controlled by that agency. Somehow that shows that Mastodon is better. Because Trump has his own Mastodon instance and doesn't need anyone to vouch for his goons?

                        Looking at the comments, maybe the issue is rather that the Bluesky company provides services to ICE. Tech companies should refuse service. Huh. I guess there is more diversity of opinion on Lemmy than I had thought, regarding the power of tech companies, democracy, and law.

                        geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG T spacecowboy@lemmy.caS 3 Replies Last reply
                        74
                        • G general_effort@lemmy.world

                          So, trying to parse what's going on here.

                          Bluesky has verified that an account claiming to belong to the US government agency ICE really is controlled by that agency. Somehow that shows that Mastodon is better. Because Trump has his own Mastodon instance and doesn't need anyone to vouch for his goons?

                          Looking at the comments, maybe the issue is rather that the Bluesky company provides services to ICE. Tech companies should refuse service. Huh. I guess there is more diversity of opinion on Lemmy than I had thought, regarding the power of tech companies, democracy, and law.

                          geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                          geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                          geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                          wrote last edited by
                          #74

                          Bluesky is a centralized platform and their mods don't ban Nazis.

                          Trump being able to clone Mastodon is not the same as letting Trump on Mastodon.social

                          G beerman595692@programming.devB 2 Replies Last reply
                          41
                          • BuelldozerB Buelldozer

                            Too many people thought that Twitters Blue Checkmark meant you were special. That attitude carries over to Bluesky and being verified.

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #75

                            Lol, yeah. If I saw an account labeled "American Nazi Party" with a blue check mark, I wouldn't think "wow, Bluesky endorses Nazis" - I'd think "wow, this isn't a satire account, these are actual Nazis, imma block them."

                            D T J 3 Replies Last reply
                            34
                            • R randomgal@lemmy.ca

                              Are they banned in Mastodon? Lmao

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              badgermurphy@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #76

                              There is no Mastodon for them to be blocked on in the sense you're talking about.

                              Mastodon is similar in setup to Lemmy in that nobody owns it and anyone can run it. I am absolutely positive they are banned on tons of Mastodon servers and not banned on tons of others. If the server you are on is federated with even one server with one that isn't banned, you could potentially see their posts, at which point you can either report those posts to your and their admins, or block them yourself.

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              9
                              • trickdacy@lemmy.worldT trickdacy@lemmy.world

                                Everyone responding here and confused why this matters seem not get the point. This post is just a warning that the types of people most of us don't want to associate with are now on that platform. The problem is not that they are verified, it's that they exist there at all.

                                Edit: some reasonable arguments have been made here for allowing these Nazis on Blue sky, which I originally thought was a bad idea, but maybe disallowing them won't actually solve anything and may exacerbate things. I don't know. I'll think about it some more.

                                ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                ripcord@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #77

                                They have always been on there. There have been waves of brigading and trolling, etc. BlueSky's blocking tools and options for no algorithm dramatically limit their visibility, and they eventually have no impact and get bored and eventually go away.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml

                                  I prefer the instance blocking Nazis instead of users manually having to do so.

                                  ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ripcord@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #78

                                  So you're not using your head then.

                                  geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • ripcord@lemmy.worldR ripcord@lemmy.world

                                    So you're not using your head then.

                                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #79

                                    You think Nazis should not be banned by admins on your instance?

                                    _ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    8
                                    • ShimitarS Shimitar

                                      I don't ban anyone or any instance in my own instance, so no they cannot be "parammanned" from Lemmy. That's not how it works and why i like Lemmy and its principles.

                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #80

                                      Find out how long your Lemmy instance stays federated with the rest of the big instances once you start hosting Nazis

                                      ShimitarS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • K krashmo@lemmy.world

                                        You don't have to be such a bitch about everything. If you guys can't even work up the courage to block a government account on an obscure social media site for fear of reprisal then you might as well enroll yourself for deportation right now because you clearly don't have what it takes to do anything actually useful to stop all this.

                                        ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ripcord@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #81

                                        You hurt someone's feelings, but are extremely accurate.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • trickdacy@lemmy.worldT trickdacy@lemmy.world

                                          What difference would it make in the social media.

                                          Apparently you slept through a fascist dictator rising to power by manipulating desperate people, specifically on social media.

                                          ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ripcord@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #82

                                          Like the white house, department of homeland security, and others before them, the account will get no traction and be ignored. It is currently working really well on bluesky.

                                          When they mandate visibility a la Twitter, that is the problem. But they don't.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 6
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World