Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. we need more users

we need more users

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
798 Posts 286 Posters 43 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Skavau

    Yes, that's correct. But I'm not aware of lemmy.ml mods running it is all I mean. That it randomises the instances for newbies on first view isn't great either.

    NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
    NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
    Nutomic
    wrote last edited by
    #789

    Good point, I made a PR to use biased random sort again that we had in the past, so larger instances are always shown near the top.

    https://github.com/LemmyNet/joinlemmy-site/pull/508

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NutomicN Nutomic

      The logic it uses is to hide any instances with more than 30% of all active users to prevent centralization, just like you say. There are also some other filters like requiring at least 5 active users.

      I This user is from outside of this forum
      I This user is from outside of this forum
      industrystandard@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #790

      Understandable but something needs to be done to lower the barrier of entry of new users joining.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • NutomicN Nutomic

        The onboarding is way too complicated for the average user. A huge part of this is that there are 100 ways to do it. Before you even can start to do anything you have to investigate and then decide on what and how to do it. And even then there is no guidance at all, you are given options and then you can either go and do some research again or try them one by one. You lose at least 90% of the users here already. It doesn’t help that fediverse users try to downplay this issue.

        The solution to this is that people should not recommend Lemmy, but a specific instance such as programming.dev (depending on the audience). The Lemmy software and join-lemmy.org are mainly targeted at potential instance admins, or those who are already familiar with the Fediverse.

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        dantel@programming.dev
        wrote last edited by
        #791

        Well, you are technically correct. That would've made it easier for me. But I see a few problems with that:

        How are you gonna make sure people start doing this?

        And even more important: If people start doing this, it might actually harm the network IMHO.

        I personally knew that something like Lemmy exists at all because I saw multiple people on Reddit recommending it as an alternative to Reddit. Often enough that I was able to remember this after some time.

        Now if people recommended programming.dev in one sub, literature.cafe in another and discuss.online in a third - there is no way I would've remembered any of it and most likely wouldn't know that it belongs to the same network. Looking at them individually emphasizes the feeling that those are some ultra niche little sites with hardly any users on them.

        Just my gut feeling, anyway.

        NutomicN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • NutomicN Nutomic

          We have an open issue for this: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/5871

          gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
          gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
          gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          wrote last edited by
          #792

          Very nice 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NutomicN Nutomic

            There is a "Join" button which goes directly to the registration page of the respective instance. Would it be clearer to rename this? Other than that I'm also happy to make improvements if you have concrete suggestions.

            Edit: Made a PR to rename Join to Sign Up: https://github.com/LemmyNet/joinlemmy-site/pull/509

            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            made3@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #793

            Well, I don't understand exactly how it works yet. My steps were to search in the Play Store for Lemmy, but there were multiple apps and all had different names. When I downloaded Boost now, there was not directly a register or sign up button. So it's probably an issue of Boost.

            NutomicN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

              I've been one of the people saying "we don't need more users. we need quality over quantity" and i was wrong.

              the way it's going, lemmy needs active users who post content sothat the network stays relevant. networks like the fediverse benefit from network effects and that means that if we have more users, that improves the value and quality of the fediverse overall.

              So please, everyone, when you can, make advertisement for the fediverse in your personal area. Go talk to friends, make attractive stickers and put them everywhere, stuff like that. We would all benefit from it.

              edit: source for the graph

              yessikgY This user is from outside of this forum
              yessikgY This user is from outside of this forum
              yessikg
              wrote last edited by
              #794

              I moved to Mbin, and I know quite a few people moved to Piefed, so you need to take that into account

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • OpenStarsO OpenStars

                Hard agree there - growth at any costs should not be our motto, just improvement in terms of features for our own sakes, and if people enjoy that and want to join us, then that's wonderful as well.

                Though at one point we had 55k active users, and now we "only" have ~35k, so it seems like it has gone down over the years. Though to be fair, then it cycled back upwards, then downwards, then upwards again, then downwards - and yet always decreasing from that peak of 55k to where we are now, an overall negative trend. Even just six months ago we had 41k, a loss of ~15% now compared ot then (correspondingly, PieFed only has ~2k users total across all instances, so this loss of 6k for Lemmy was nowhere near balanced by a corresponding increase in PieFed as would be explained by a migration effect).

                But even if you are fully right, and this all reflects relative stagnation, that's still not a good thing imho, given the waves of Reddit migrants that we've seen coming here during the same time-period. It means that in roughly equal numbers to new people joining we are also losing a LOT of people, to parts unknown (perhaps they went back to Reddit, as many claim to have done in r/RedditAlternatives, or perhaps they moved instead to BlueSky?).

                D This user is from outside of this forum
                D This user is from outside of this forum
                desentizised@lemmy.zip
                wrote last edited by
                #795

                I think that every platform will reach sort of an equilibrium during its lifetime. That relative "plateau" may last for months, years or even longer than that, but I think it will always be reached after its peak.

                imho the height of that peak and plateau speak to the overall popularity potential of the platform. Which is just that. A potential to attract masses. Whether maximizing this is a core goal is a different question.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M made3@sh.itjust.works

                  Well, I don't understand exactly how it works yet. My steps were to search in the Play Store for Lemmy, but there were multiple apps and all had different names. When I downloaded Boost now, there was not directly a register or sign up button. So it's probably an issue of Boost.

                  NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
                  NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
                  Nutomic
                  wrote last edited by
                  #796

                  There is nothing preventing apps from providing a registration flow. For example Voyager has it. I suppose the problem is again which instance to choose for signup. You can discuss this in https://lemmy.world/c/boostforlemmy or https://lemmy.world/c/lemmyapps.

                  As for multiple Lemmy apps being available: Most of the current Lemmy users came here in 2023 when Reddit locked down the API and killed third-party apps. Thats why a lot of apps are now available, and everyone can decide for himself which one he prefers.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • D dantel@programming.dev

                    Well, you are technically correct. That would've made it easier for me. But I see a few problems with that:

                    How are you gonna make sure people start doing this?

                    And even more important: If people start doing this, it might actually harm the network IMHO.

                    I personally knew that something like Lemmy exists at all because I saw multiple people on Reddit recommending it as an alternative to Reddit. Often enough that I was able to remember this after some time.

                    Now if people recommended programming.dev in one sub, literature.cafe in another and discuss.online in a third - there is no way I would've remembered any of it and most likely wouldn't know that it belongs to the same network. Looking at them individually emphasizes the feeling that those are some ultra niche little sites with hardly any users on them.

                    Just my gut feeling, anyway.

                    NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
                    NutomicN This user is from outside of this forum
                    Nutomic
                    wrote last edited by
                    #797

                    That is true. I made a post just now to gather suggestions for improving the website, please have a look and comment if you have any ideas: https://lemmyverse.link/lemmy.ml/post/41719890

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • die4ever@retrolemmy.comD die4ever@retrolemmy.com

                      they are separate, but not huge

                      https://piefed.fediverse.observer/stats

                      https://mbin.fediverse.observer/stats

                      PazintachP This user is from outside of this forum
                      PazintachP This user is from outside of this forum
                      Pazintach
                      wrote last edited by
                      #798

                      They seem doing fine, especially PieFed.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • 1
                      • 2
                      • 36
                      • 37
                      • 38
                      • 39
                      • 40
                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World