Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The Fedi Forum

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Bluesky just verified ICE

Bluesky just verified ICE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
203 Posts 90 Posters 128 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LeonD Leon

    You know that the problem isn’t that they’re verifying the gestapo, it’s that they’re platforming and subsequently legitimising them.

    ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
    ShimitarS This user is from outside of this forum
    Shimitar
    wrote last edited by
    #57

    Wake up. Ice, being government, it's already legitimized enough in real life.

    What difference would it make in the social media. Better if they are out in the open in social media instead, at least they get responsible for what they post, officially.

    trickdacy@lemmy.worldT 1 Reply Last reply
    14
    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com

      Posting propaganda for a terrorist organization engaged in widespread public abuse is against their rules, do they allow official verified pages for groups like ISIS or Boko Harem?

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      wrote last edited by auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      #58

      They haven’t posted anything yet.

      ‘Official verified’ isn’t a thing on bluesky. It’s self-verification, just means you own the domain.

      Most western governments are terrorist. Can you name an administration that isn’t guilty of war crimes? Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT B JessicaS tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comT 4 Replies Last reply
      1
      • LorL Lor

        Block them if you want. Block lists are public so... use caution.

        There are MANY government accounts on Blusky. I think if they did not verify them, the government would find someone to buy them or shut them down. Use your heads here.

        geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
        geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
        geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        wrote last edited by
        #59

        I prefer the instance blocking Nazis instead of users manually having to do so.

        ripcord@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
        12
        • R raman_klogius@ani.social

          The block log is public. It's basically giving uncle Sam a list of targets to hit next.

          Instead burn the bridge connecting to bsky, or ignore the account clientside which is not public.

          K This user is from outside of this forum
          K This user is from outside of this forum
          krashmo@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #60

          You don't have to be such a bitch about everything. If you guys can't even work up the courage to block a government account on an obscure social media site for fear of reprisal then you might as well enroll yourself for deportation right now because you clearly don't have what it takes to do anything actually useful to stop all this.

          ripcord@lemmy.worldR 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
            This post did not contain any content.
            BappityB This user is from outside of this forum
            BappityB This user is from outside of this forum
            Bappity
            wrote last edited by
            #61

            why is this such an issue?? it just shows everyone who to clown on more?

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

              Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

              The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

              trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
              trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
              trickdacy@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #62

              So?

              Any place Nazis are allowed is not a place I want to be. At least on any Lemmy server I'd not block, Nazis get banned

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              12
              • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                This post did not contain any content.
                trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                trickdacy@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by trickdacy@lemmy.world
                #63

                Everyone responding here and confused why this matters seem not get the point. This post is just a warning that the types of people most of us don't want to associate with are now on that platform. The problem is not that they are verified, it's that they exist there at all.

                Edit: some reasonable arguments have been made here for allowing these Nazis on Blue sky, which I originally thought was a bad idea, but maybe disallowing them won't actually solve anything and may exacerbate things. I don't know. I'll think about it some more.

                ripcord@lemmy.worldR K AndyA P 4 Replies Last reply
                15
                • ShimitarS Shimitar

                  Wake up. Ice, being government, it's already legitimized enough in real life.

                  What difference would it make in the social media. Better if they are out in the open in social media instead, at least they get responsible for what they post, officially.

                  trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trickdacy@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #64

                  What difference would it make in the social media.

                  Apparently you slept through a fascist dictator rising to power by manipulating desperate people, specifically on social media.

                  ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
                  9
                  • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                    Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

                    The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                    thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
                    wrote last edited by thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com
                    #65

                    A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                    ripcord@lemmy.worldR S 2 Replies Last reply
                    7
                    • JessicaS Jessica

                      How about kick them off the platform? Make a big deal about doing it. Tell them to fuck off. Stop tolerating intolerance. I don’t know how blue sky works, but surely there is a way to kick them off of the platform.

                      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trickdacy@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #66

                      Nah tolerating intolerance has been working out well so far. I mean "free speech" is worth literally any price, and further, we should never pressure private companies to align with common morality. That's just censorship!!

                      HUGE /s, and thank you for an actually sane take ITT.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • A auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                        They haven’t posted anything yet.

                        ‘Official verified’ isn’t a thing on bluesky. It’s self-verification, just means you own the domain.

                        Most western governments are terrorist. Can you name an administration that isn’t guilty of war crimes? Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

                        trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                        trickdacy@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
                        trickdacy@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #67

                        Should they all be automatically blocked from socials?

                        For companies that have morals or a backbone, abso fucking lutely

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • trickdacy@lemmy.worldT trickdacy@lemmy.world

                          So?

                          Any place Nazis are allowed is not a place I want to be. At least on any Lemmy server I'd not block, Nazis get banned

                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          randomgal@lemmy.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #68

                          Are they banned in Mastodon? Lmao

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          5
                          • T thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com

                            A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                            ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                            ripcord@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
                            ripcord@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #69

                            Which no one will read because bluesky has a really great block system

                            boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                            10
                            • S stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                              Yeah, so? Verification just means they are who they say they are. It doesn't mean Bluesky endorses their posts.

                              The White House has a verified Bluesky account, too. They haven't posted anything in months, though, presumably because of all the ratio-ing.

                              BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
                              BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
                              Buelldozer
                              wrote last edited by
                              #70

                              Too many people thought that Twitters Blue Checkmark meant you were special. That attitude carries over to Bluesky and being verified.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              24
                              • T thereturnofpeb@reddthat.com

                                A private group publishing posts for another group is exactly the act of endorsing their posts.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                wrote last edited by
                                #71

                                It's not, though. Do you think that the admins of reddthat.com endorse everything you post? Creating a public forum for people (including the representatives of organizations) to post on doesn't imply that the forum endorses any of the content those people post on it.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                7
                                • ripcord@lemmy.worldR ripcord@lemmy.world

                                  Which no one will read because bluesky has a really great block system

                                  boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  boiglenoight@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  boiglenoight@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #72

                                  Yeap. This is a provocative, reactive take that doesn’t consider much.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    G This user is from outside of this forum
                                    general_effort@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #73

                                    So, trying to parse what's going on here.

                                    Bluesky has verified that an account claiming to belong to the US government agency ICE really is controlled by that agency. Somehow that shows that Mastodon is better. Because Trump has his own Mastodon instance and doesn't need anyone to vouch for his goons?

                                    Looking at the comments, maybe the issue is rather that the Bluesky company provides services to ICE. Tech companies should refuse service. Huh. I guess there is more diversity of opinion on Lemmy than I had thought, regarding the power of tech companies, democracy, and law.

                                    geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG T spacecowboy@lemmy.caS 3 Replies Last reply
                                    74
                                    • G general_effort@lemmy.world

                                      So, trying to parse what's going on here.

                                      Bluesky has verified that an account claiming to belong to the US government agency ICE really is controlled by that agency. Somehow that shows that Mastodon is better. Because Trump has his own Mastodon instance and doesn't need anyone to vouch for his goons?

                                      Looking at the comments, maybe the issue is rather that the Bluesky company provides services to ICE. Tech companies should refuse service. Huh. I guess there is more diversity of opinion on Lemmy than I had thought, regarding the power of tech companies, democracy, and law.

                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #74

                                      Bluesky is a centralized platform and their mods don't ban Nazis.

                                      Trump being able to clone Mastodon is not the same as letting Trump on Mastodon.social

                                      G beerman595692@programming.devB 2 Replies Last reply
                                      41
                                      • BuelldozerB Buelldozer

                                        Too many people thought that Twitters Blue Checkmark meant you were special. That attitude carries over to Bluesky and being verified.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #75

                                        Lol, yeah. If I saw an account labeled "American Nazi Party" with a blue check mark, I wouldn't think "wow, Bluesky endorses Nazis" - I'd think "wow, this isn't a satire account, these are actual Nazis, imma block them."

                                        D T J 3 Replies Last reply
                                        34
                                        • R randomgal@lemmy.ca

                                          Are they banned in Mastodon? Lmao

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          badgermurphy@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #76

                                          There is no Mastodon for them to be blocked on in the sense you're talking about.

                                          Mastodon is similar in setup to Lemmy in that nobody owns it and anyone can run it. I am absolutely positive they are banned on tons of Mastodon servers and not banned on tons of others. If the server you are on is federated with even one server with one that isn't banned, you could potentially see their posts, at which point you can either report those posts to your and their admins, or block them yourself.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          9
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 6
                                          • 10
                                          • 11
                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World